Report of Supreme Court high council meeting
In addition to the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court met on Saturday 11th of 1397, under the chairmanship of the Supreme Court head of the Sejd Yusuf Haleim, and convened a series of debates on issues.
The Council firstly identified the cases of forgery, trickery, cheating and manipulation in the registration of property rights that were discovered during the review of the normal and contingency audits, and the result of the considerations of the authorities of the repository offices or the records of the documents and documents, so that whenever In relation to such issues, the results of preliminary investigations through the General Directorate of Judicial Investigation to the relevant authorities or, if the subject is related to public law, formally sent to the General Directorate of State Cases, in order to safeguard public rights and property Eligible enforcement actions.
It has also been directed at the goal of better regulation of appeals cases for criminal cases and to prevent the loss of relevant authorities at the Supreme Council. Claims that have been rejected through the Attorney General's Office of Advisers Board can be relied upon The commission is not a member of the Supreme Court and, in the context of the Supreme Court's Supreme Court, preparatory commission for implementation, only on the basis of the demands made under the provisions of Article 282 of the Criminal Procedure Code and 34 Law on the Establishment and Competence of the Judiciary, the Commission Supreme Court Court Referrals and later According to the Commission, only the opinions that can be referred to the Supreme Council's Supreme Council are considered, and the relevant opinions surrounding the opinion of the Supreme Court are appropriate.
Later, due to contingency audits in the Balkh and Badakhshan Provincial Court of Appeals, after identifying the relevant violations, in accordance with the provisions of the Regulation on the Execution of Judicial Discipline, two former bards of the Balkh Appeals Court and the Keshm District Court of Badakhshan District Necessary correction.
Subsequently, according to the official letter of the Directorate General of State Cases of the Ministry of Justice, the Public Prosecutor and the Study Director were given a duty to issue a petition under the auspices of the honorable people regarding a public law ruling that was ruled out in favor of the government, but the proportion of the problem of implementation was not implemented. Judge Poh Mohammad Sangari, a member of the Supreme Council of the Supreme Council of the Supreme Court, will conduct an investigation everywhere and present the necessary comments on the matter to the next meeting.
In the same vein, in view of the verdict of the Court of Appeals of Herat province, by modifying Part 285 of the Supreme Council of Supreme Council of the Islamic Republic of Iran on April 3, 2012, it was stipulated that civil and civil rights tribunals could hear expert opinions in related cases, in accordance with the provisions of Articles 175 and 176 of the Code of Civil Procedure Principles.
In addition, at the Supreme Council session, a request for the conversion of a court of a public law matter was filed and, at the request of the Attorney General's Office, 27 criminal cases were filed to appeal courts in the provinces of Faryab, Jawzjan, Ghor, Samangan, Paktika, Ghazni, Takhar and Nangarhar.